MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216884447

The international network of Arthur Löbbecke (1850-1932), banker in Braunschweig and one of the foremost collectors of Greek coins, through his early correspondence with foreigners (1876-1889)

2021· article· en· W3216884447 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
François De Callataÿ, Bernhard Weisser

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue belge de numismatique et de sigillographie · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCabinet (room)NumismaticsGermanQuarter (Canadian coin)HistoryClassicsBullionAncient historyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With more than 28,000 carefully selected pieces, Arthur Lobbecke, a rich banker from Braunschweig, built one of the most important collections of Greek coins ever. Purchased by the Berlin coin cabinet in 1906, it still represents more than a quarter of the complete collection for Greek and Roman Provincial coinages. The Berlin coin cabinet also keeps his astonishingly vast correspondence, estimated to comprise more than 6,000 letters, almost all fully devoted to numismatics. This is without known parallel and provides some of the best possible evidence to reconstruct the social network of the 19th-century ‘republic of medals’. This paper focuses on small part of this voluminous correspondence: the letters which were not written in German and sent between 1876 and 1889.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue belge de numismatique et de sigillographieSame topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207