MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216920273 · doi:10.18542/reumam.v4i1.12320

GEOHISTÓRIA NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA: UMA REFLEXÃO SOBRE AS TRANSFORMAÇÕES TERRITORIAIS NA FRONTEIRA DO SUDESTE PARAENSE

2019· article· pt· W3216920273 on OpenAlexaff
Mateus Monteiro Lobato, Aluísio Fernandes Silva Júnior

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversidade e Meio Ambiente · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Northwest Territories
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo é um esforço intelectual para compreender uma parte das transformações territoriais ocorridas na fronteira amazônica, especificamente o Sudeste Paraense. Tendo em vista esse enfoque, buscamos lançar um olhar sobre a trajetória histórica da fronteira tentando capturar os principais desdobramentos na malha territorial. A premissa teórica subjacente a análise é de que as determinações gerais da reprodução do capital incidentes ao longo do tempo animaram os sujeitos sociais a impingir mudanças territoriais. Logo, as principais atividades econômicas desenvolvidas no Sudeste Paraense: caucho, castanha, madeireira, pecuária e mineração, são responsáveis por instrumentalizar os sujeitos sociais que atuam no território. O recorte temporal foi estipulado a partir da primeira atividade relevante conduzida no Sudeste Paraense até os dias atuais. E a representação cartográfica procurou capturar os momentos chaves de cada uma dessas atividades econômicas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversidade e Meio AmbienteSame topicUrban Development and Societal IssuesFrench-language works237,207