Convolution model for COVID-19 rate predictions and health effort levels computation for Saudi Arabia, France, and Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many published infection prediction models, such as the extended SEIR (E-SEIR) model, are used as a study and report tool to aid health authorities to manage the epidemic plans successfully. These models face many challenges, mainly the reliability of the infection rate predictions related to the initial boundary conditions, formulation complexity, lengthy computations, and the limited result scope. We attribute these challenges to the absence of a solution framework that encapsulates the interacted activities that manage: the infection growth process, the infection spread process and the health effort process. In response to these challenges, we formulated such a framework first as the basis of our new convolution prediction model (CPM). CPM links through convolution integration, three temporal profile levels: input (infected and active cases), transformational (health efforts), and output functions (recovered, quarantine, and death cases). COVID-19 data defines the input and output temporal profiles; hence it is possible to deduce the cumulative efforts temporal response (CETR) function for the health effort level. The new CETR function determines the health effort level over a period. Also, CETR plays a role in predicting the evolution of the underlying infection and active cases profiles without a system of differential equations. This work covers three countries: Saudi Arabia, France, and Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".