Apparent slip in colloidal suspensions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we have carried out experiments to characterize the wall slip of colloidal suspensions of kaolinites. To demonstrate slip, the rheological measurements were carried out with parallel-plate geometry with smooth and rough plates. The asperities of the rough surface penetrated the slip layer and created a nearly no-slip region, whereas the smooth plate showed significantly higher slip, a conclusion drawn by comparing the macroscopic flow curves in both cases. Two slip regimes were identified, namely, (i) an elastic slip regime below the yield stress of the suspension where the material slips like a solid and (ii) a slip regime above the yield stress where the material yields and flows. The slip velocity was quantified using a simple phenomenological slip model that seems to capture slip in both flow regimes. The transition from the first slip regime to the other has been resolved numerically as the material starts yielding first at the edge of the parallel-plate geometry with the yield point propagating inwards as the rotational speed is increased. The numerical method also establishes uniquely the yield stress value, which was found to agree with data obtained from parallel-plate, cone-and-plate, and concentric cylinder geometries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".