Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet essai examine deux changements importants que subissent le mourir et la mort dans le monde pluriforme et sécularisé d’aujourd’hui. Le premier changement met en scène l’autonomie, les souhaits d’autonomie nourris pendant la vie s’étendant désormais au moment et à la manière de mourir. L’euthanasie permet à une personne d’éviter la condition douloureuse et difficile qui précède la fin de vie. Un second changement majeur est que ceux qui meurent et ceux qui restent peuvent nourrir des croyances et des attentes différentes concernant ce qui se passe au moment de la mort et après. Dans le monde chrétien, par exemple, les rituels plutôt uniformes qui étaient pratiqués avant et après la mort ne reflètent plus les croyances d’un grand nombre de personnes confrontées à la mort aujourd’hui. Ce bref essai explore l’imbrication de ces deux évolutions relatives à la mort et au mourir dans la société actuelle, en mettant l’accent sur le pays de l’auteur, les Pays-Bas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".