MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217059426 · doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.716944

Increase in Plasma Oxidized Phosphatidylcholines (OxPCs) in Patients Presenting With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)

2021· article· en· W3217059426 on OpenAlexafffund
Zahra Solati, Arun Surendran, Andrea L. Edel, Marynia Roznik, David M. Allen, Amir Ravandi

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
FundersNational Institutes of HealthResearch Manitoba
KeywordsInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionCardiologyMedicineMyocardial reperfusionElevation (ballistics)Myocardial Reperfusion InjuryMyocardial ischemiaPhysicsIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) occurs as a result of acute occlusion of the coronary artery. Despite successful reperfusion using percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a large percentage of myocardial cells die after reperfusion which is recognized as ischemia/reperfusion injury (I/R). Oxidized phosphatidylcholines (OxPCs) are a group of oxidized lipids generated through non-enzymatic oxidation and have pro-inflammatory properties. This study aimed to examine the roles of OxPCs in a clinical setting of myocardial I/R. Methods: Blood samples were collected from STEMI patients at presentation prior to primary PCI (PPCI) (Isch) and at 4 time-points post-PPCI, including 2 h (R-2 h), 24 h (R-24 h), 48 h (R-48 h), and 30 days (R-30 d) post-PPCI. As controls, blood samples were collected from patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease after diagnostic coronary angiography. Aspiration thrombectomy was also performed in selected STEMI patients. High-performance lipid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used for OxPCs analysis. Results: Twenty-two distinct OxPC species were identified and quantified in plasma samples in patients presenting with STEMI. These compounds were categorized as fragmented and non-fragmented species. Total levels of OxPCs did not significantly differ between Isch and control groups. However, total levels of fragmented OxPCs increased significantly in the ischemic period compared with controls (Isch: 4.79 ± 0.94, Control: 1.69 ± 0.19 ng/μl of plasma, P < 0.05). Concentrations of non-fragmented OxPCs had significant reductions during ischemia compared to the control group (Isch: 4.84 ± 0.30, Control: 6.6 ± 0.51 ng/μl, P < 0.05). Levels of total OxPCs in patients with STEMI were not significantly different during reperfusion periods. However, fragmented OxPCs levels were elevated at 48 h post-reperfusion and decreased at 30 days following MI, when compared to R-2 h and R-24 h time points (Isch: 4.79 ± 0.94, R-2 h: 5.33 ± 1.17, R-24 h: 5.20 ± 1.1, R-48 h: 4.18 ± 1.07, R-30 d: 1.87 ± 0.31 ng/μl, P < 0.05). Plasma levels of two fragmented OxPCs, namely, POVPC and PONPC were significantly correlated with peak creatine kinase (CK) levels ( P < 0.05). As with plasma levels, the dominant OxPC species in coronary aspirated thrombus were fragmented OxPCs, which constituted 77% of total OxPC concentrations. Conclusion: Biologically active fragmented OxPC were elevated in patients presenting with STEMI when compared to controls. PONPC concentrations were subsequently increased after PPCI resulting in reperfusion. Moreover, levels of POVPC and PONPC were also associated with peak CK levels. Since these molecules are potent stimulators for cardiomyocyte cell death, therapeutics attenuating their activities can result in a novel therapeutic pathway for myocardial salvage for patients undergoing reperfusion therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.737

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MedicineSame topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207