P028 Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) Survey: Patient and Healthcare Professional Perspectives on Experience of Ulcerative Colitis Symptoms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are associated with substantial quality of life and economic burdens (Kawalec, 2016). The Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) study aims to further the understanding of the experience and impact of symptoms on patients' lives and elucidate any gaps in communication between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients with moderate-to-severe UC and CD in the United States (US), Europe, and Japan. These data focus on US patients with UC and US HCPs. METHODS: An online, quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted with HCPs (n=200) and patients with moderate-to-severe UC (n=200) in the US between May (HCPs) and July (patients) 2021. Moderate-to-severe UC was defined using criteria based on previous treatment experience, steroid use and/or hospitalization. The HCP survey included physicians (89%) and non-physician HCPs (11%) who are responsible for making prescribing decisions. Data collected included perspectives on the experience and impact of symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe UC. RESULTS: The top three symptoms currently (past month) and ever suffered by patients (mean age: 40.4, 61.5% male) were diarrhea (62.5% and 74.0%, respectively), bowel urgency (47.0% and 61.5%) and increased stool frequency (38.5% and 57.5%). Blood in stool was reported by 27.0% of patients as currently suffering, and 51.0% ever. According to HCPs (78.0% male), the top three symptoms reported by patients were diarrhea (73.5% ranked in top 3), blood in stool (69.0%), and increased stool frequency (37.5%). Bowel urgency was recorded in the top 3 patient-reported symptoms by 24.0% of HCPs. Patients self-rated their disease-severity as 10.5% (n = 21) mild UC, 71.0% (n = 142) moderate UC, 17.5% (n = 35) severe UC, and 1.0% (n = 2) patients did not know. Bowel urgency was more frequently reported in patients with severe disease (62.9%, n = 22) when compared with those with mild-to-moderate disease (42.9%, n = 70). Among the overall patient population, 76.5% (n = 153) were receiving advanced therapies (biologic or novel oral therapy). Bowel urgency was currently experienced by 46.4% of these patients. Only 38.2% of patients felt completely comfortable reporting bowel urgency to their HCP. Of patients not comfortable reporting bowel urgency, 62.2% (n = 23) reported they felt embarrassed talking about it. Among HCPs, 75.5% (n = 151) reported they proactively discussed bowel urgency at routine appointments. Those HCPs who reported that they do not proactively discuss bowel urgency (24.5%, n = 49) cited the main reason as they expect the patient to bring it up (46.9%, n = 23). CONCLUSION: Bowel urgency is the second-most commonly reported symptom by patients with moderate-to-severe UC but is not among the HCP-perceived top three most reported symptoms. A substantial proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe UC receiving advanced therapies continue to report bowel urgency. A communication gap between patients and HCPs was identified and highlights the under appreciation of bowel urgency as an important symptom impacting patients' daily life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".