Perbaikan Jalan di Kelurahan Siwalankerto Kecamatan Wonocolo Kota Surabaya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kerusakan pada jalan akan menimbulkan banyak kerugian yang dapat dirasakan oleh penggunasecara langsung, karena sudah pasti akan menghambat laju dan kenyamanan pengguna jalanserta banyak menimbulkan korban akibat dari kerusakan jalan yang tidak segera ditangani.Untuk menjaga agar kondisi jalan tetap pada performa yang layak dalam melayani berbagaimoda transportasi perlu adanya evaluasi permukaan jalan untuk mengetahui jalan tersebutapakah masih dalam kondisi yang baik atau perlu adanya program peningkatan pemeliharaanrutin atau pemeliharaan berkala. Keberadaan jalan di Kelurahan Siwalankerto tidak semua ruasjalan dalam kondisi bagus, terdapat beberapa ruas jalan yang mengalami kerusakan. Ruas jalanyang mengalami kerusakan tersebut terletak di RW.2 tepatnya di RT.05, RT.06, dan RT.07 sertaRW.4 pada RT.04 dan di dekat pintu gerbang Dinas Perhubungan dan LLAJ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.053 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".