MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217127449 · doi:10.1109/twc.2021.3127872

Real-Time Status Updates in Wireless HARQ With Imperfect Feedback Channel

2021· article· en· W3217127449 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Hybrid automatic repeat requestNetwork packetReal-time computingComputer networkWirelessAutomatic repeat requestTelecommunications linkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the impact of the erroneous wireless control feedback channel on the Age of Information (AoI) performance. We consider a point-to-point communication setup employing packet combining strategies to transmit status update packets over an erroneous wireless data channel. The sender receives the positive acknowledgment (ACK) or negative acknowledgment (NACK) of packet reception over an error-prone wireless feedback channel. To mitigate the impact of the imperfect feedback channel on the system performance, we adopt an asymmetric signal detection model to control the detection accuracy of ACK and NACK signals. We then compute the explicit expressions for the average AoIs under preemptive and non-preemptive service management policies. We show the optimum parameter design for the control channel model in order to minimize the average AoI. The numerical results validate the analysis and provide detailed perspectives on the optimal signal detection setup minimizing the average AoI, and the possible trade-off between AoI and resource utilization. Generally, the analysis for a preemption setting illustrates that a better protection for the NACK messages compared to the ACK messages can preserve the minimum AoI performance. Especially, under a high noisy feedback channel setup, we show that the viable solution minimizing the average AoI is a blind transmission mechanism at the cost of increasing unnecessary utilization of the channel resources. Moreover, the analysis for a non-preemptive policy reveals the dependence of the optimal feedback signal detection design on the status packet generation rate at the sensor. Such a dependency makes the feedback signal detection approach to provide a more reliable ACK detection compared to NACK messages under the condition of more frequent packet arrival, whereas the opposite holds under the condition of less frequent packet arrival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it