MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217152209 · doi:10.47194/ijgor.v2i2.81

Determining Agricultural Premium Insurance in Malang City using Black Scholes Model

2021· article· en· W3217152209 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Herlia Widi, Dea Nisa Rahma Lani, Faridatul Hasanah

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Global Operations Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicLeadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPercentileProduction (economics)EconomicsAgricultureBlack–Scholes modelEconometricsQuarter (Canadian coin)Agricultural scienceAgricultural economicsActuarial scienceMathematicsStatisticsEnvironmental scienceGeographyMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the determination of rainfall-based agricultural insurance premium prices using the Black-Scholes model. The Black-Scholes model was originally used to determine the price of European-type options. The research method used is a literature study with secondary data collection. The data used in this study are rainfall data and rice production results in the city of Malang from 2015 to 2020. Based on the results and discussion, rainfall which is strongly correlated with rice production results is in quarter 2. The premium results obtained are different according to the desired percentile. In addition to percentiles, taking R_0 also affects the premium price. When R_0=322, the premium price tends to be cheaper than R_0=271.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.447
GPT teacher head0.563
Teacher spread0.116 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Global Operations ResearchSame topicLeadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making StudiesFrench-language works237,207