MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Simultaneous Determination of Candesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide in Human Plasma by HPLC-MS/MS

2021· article· en· W3217188055 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug development & registration · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Canadian institutionsCanadian Public Health Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCandesartanHydrochlorothiazideChromatographyChemistryValsartanHigh-performance liquid chromatographyIndapamideFormic acidAngiotensin IIPharmacologyDiureticMedicineInternal medicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Combined drugs have the greatest efficacy and safety in arterial hypertension treatment. The combination of candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide (AT1-receptor antagonist and a thiazide diuretic, respectively) provides high efficiency of antihypertensive combination therapy, therefore it is widely used in medical practice. Developing a method for simultaneous determination of candesartan and hydrochlorithiazide in human blood plasma is necessary for performing the analytical part of pharmacokinetic studies and bioequivalence studies of multicomponent drugs. Aim. The aim of this study is to develop a method for quantitative determination of candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) for further bioequivalence studies. Materials and methods . Determination of candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide in human plasma by HPLC-MS/MS. The samples were processed by acetonitrile protein precipitation. Internal standard: mixed solution of valsartan and indapamide. Mobile phase: 0.1 % formic acid solution in water (eluent A), 0.1 % formic acid in acetonitrile (eluent B). Column: Phenomenex Luna Phenyl-Hexyl, 50x4.6 mm, 5 μm. Analytical range: 2.00– 300.00 ng/mL for candesartan, 2.00–200.00 ng/mL for hydrochlorothiazide in human plasma. Ionization source: electrospray ionization. Detection conditions: 441.10 → 192.00 m/z, 441.10 → 263.15 m/z (candesartan), 295.85 → 269.00 m/z (hydrochlorothiazide), 436.00 → 207.05 m/z (valsartan), 363.85 → 132.10, 363.85 → 189.00 m/z (indapamide). Results and discussion . This method was validated by selectivity, matrix effect, calibration curve, accuracy, precision, spike recovery, the lower limit of quantification, carry-over effect and stability. The developed method meets the requirements for conducting bioequivalence studies of medicinal products within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union. Conclusion. The analytical range was 2.00–300.00 ng/mL for candesartan, 2.00–200.00 ng/mL for hydrochlorothiazide in human plasma. The method was applied in BE study of the combination of candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it