Vector Auto-Regressive Deep Neural Network: A Data-Driven Deep Learning-Based Directed Functional Connectivity Estimation Toolbox
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An important goal in neuroscience is to elucidate the causal relationships between the brain's different regions. This can help reveal the brain's functional circuitry and diagnose lesions. Currently there are a lack of approaches to functional connectome estimation that leverage the state-of-the-art in deep learning architectures and training methodologies. Therefore, we propose a new framework based on a vector auto-regressive deep neural network (VARDNN) architecture. Our approach consists of a set of nodes, each with a deep neural network structure. These nodes can be mapped to any spatial sub-division based on the data to be analyzed, such as anatomical brain regions from which representative neural signals can be obtained. VARDNN learns to reproduce experimental time series data using modern deep learning training techniques. Based on this, we developed two novel directed functional connectivity (dFC) measures, namely VARDNN-DI and VARDNN-GC. We evaluated our measures against a number of existing functional connectome estimation measures, such as partial correlation and multivariate Granger causality combined with large dimensionality counter-measure techniques. Our measures outperformed them across various types of ground truth data, especially as the number of nodes increased. We applied VARDNN to fMRI data to compare the dFC between 41 healthy control vs. 32 Alzheimer's disease subjects. Our VARDNN-DI measure detected lesioned regions consistent with previous studies and separated the two groups well in a subject-wise evaluation framework. Summarily, the VARDNN framework has powerful capabilities for whole brain dFC estimation. We have implemented VARDNN as an open-source toolbox that can be freely downloaded for researchers who wish to carry out functional connectome analysis on their own data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.043 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".