MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3217209091 · doi:10.1121/10.0007834

Underwater noise produced by anthropogenic activities on Vancouver Island, British Columbia

2021· article· en· W3217209091 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kelsie A. Murchy, Svein Vagle, Francis Juanes

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaySoundscapeUnderwaterEnvironmental scienceOceanographyLoggingAmbient noise levelEstuaryMarine ecosystemNoise (video)EcosystemFisherySound (geography)GeographyGeologyEcologyForestryBiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent decades shipping traffic has been increasing, leading to elevated ambient underwater noise. Extensive research has been conducted on the changes to ambient noise levels of moving ships, but little is known for ships at anchor. Vancouver Island, British Columbia has many anchorage locations where freighters stop prior to entering the Port of Vancouver. Additionally, Vancouver Island has logging activities that occur in estuaries and surrounding waters. These human activities raise concern about what impacts they might be having on the soundscape and marine organisms that inhabit these key locations. Cowichan Bay, BC is an industrialized bay and a key migration corridor for Pacific Salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.). To understand changes to the ambient noise levels in Cowichan Bay, with different anthropogenic activities, seven stationary hydrophones were deployed during Fall 2019 and 2020. Results show substantial changes in the soundscape with both anchored freighters and logging activities for the duration of their presence in the bay, with elevated SPL detected throughout the bay for anchored freighters. Our results demonstrate the impact anchored freighters and logging activities have on underwater soundscapes and are the first step in understanding the impact these activities have on marine organisms and important ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicMarine animal studies overview→French-language works237,207→