Electrochromic Displays Having Two‐Dimensional CIE Color Space Tunability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Electrochromic devices with a wide color gamut distribution have long been sought after for non‐emissive display technologies. The current state‐of‐the‐art multicolor electrochromic displays utilize a single electrochromic layer, which restricts their color tunability within a linear or curved segment scope in International Commission on Illumination (CIE) color space and thus leads to limited color hues. Herein, it is demonstrated vivid electrochromic displays with broadened color hues via fabricating Zn‐based multicolor electrochromic displays having 2D CIE color space tunability. In addition, it is revealed that a Fabry–Perot nanocavity structure can further tune the color hues via altering the coordinate of the 2D CIE color space. It is known that this is the first demonstration of 2D CIE color space tunability realization from a single transparent or reflective electrochromic device. These findings represent a novel strategy for fabricating multicolor electrochromic displays and are expected to advance the development of electrochromic displays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".