MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Channel Quality Prediction for Adaptive Underwater Acoustic Communication

2021· article· en· W3217286936 on OpenAlexaff
Hossein Ghannadrezaii, J. Alasdair Macdonald, Jean‐François Bousquet, David R. Barclay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceBathymetryUnderwaterHidden Markov modelMarkov processSimulationTelecommunicationsGeologySpeech recognitionMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the communication quality of an underwater acoustic link between two nodes is quantified by the predicted channel gain and delay spread using a stochastic and reinforcement learning model. The stochastic model generates an ensemble of time-varying channel characteristics by capturing the effect of known environmental changes including changes in sound speed profile, tides and bathymetry. Along with the stochastic model to capture the impact of unknown environmental parameters on channel quality a hidden Markov model is utilized to complement sparse channel measurements and predict the channel characteristics over a long time period spanning multiple days. In this work, the nodes are bottom mounted in a shallow turbulent water environment, with known tide cycles, physical oceanography conditions and channel geometry. As such, the channel characteristics can be estimated using a simulation software model at the remote nodes. While the simulation model is used to estimate the initial channel condition between the nodes in short-term deployment, as will be shown, the hidden Markov model provides an accurate channel characteristics prediction for long term deployment, which can be utilized by software-defined acoustic nodes such that they can adapt to the time varying acoustic channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207