MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217350158 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2021.3130725

Detection of Individual Trees in UAV LiDAR Point Clouds Using a Deep Learning Framework Based on Multichannel Representation

2021· article· en· W3217350158 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhipeng Luo, Ziyue Zhang, Wen Li, Yiping Chen, Cheng Wang, Abdul Nurunnabi, Jonathan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsLidarPoint cloudComputer scienceDiscriminative modelRangingRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceParametric statisticsTree (set theory)Pattern recognition (psychology)Deep learningRepresentation (politics)Data miningMathematicsGeographyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Individual tree detection is critical for forest investigation and monitoring. Several existing methods have difficulties to detect trees in complex forest environments due to insufficiently mining descriptive features. This study proposes a deep learning (DL) framework based on a designed multichannel information complementarity representation for detecting trees in complex forest using UAV laser scanning point clouds. The proposed method consists of two main stages: ground filtering and tree detection. In the first stage, a modified graph convolution network with a local topological information layer is designed to separate the ground points. Unlike most existing parametric methods, our ground filtering method avoids the optimal parameters selection to adapt to different kinds of environments. For tree detection, a top-down slice (TDS) module is first designed to mine the vertical structure information in a top-down way. Then, a special multichannel representation (MCR) is developed to preserve different distribution patterns of points from complementary perspectives. Finally, a multibranch network (MBNet) is proposed for individual tree detection by fusing multichannel features, which can provide discriminative information for MBNet to detect trees more accurately. MBNet was evaluated on seven forest areas [UAV light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data with the mean size of 14 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$000~\text {m}^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and point density of 250 points/ <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text {m}^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> ]. Experimental results showed that the proposed framework achieves excellent performance. Our method obtains promising performance with a mean recall of 89.23% and a mean F1-score of 87.04%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.568
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207