MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217356313 · doi:10.5376/mpb.2021.12.0032

Effect of on Nutrient Resorption Efficiency, Metal Ion Concentrations and Nutrient Ratios of <i>Achnatherum inebrians</i> under Various Nitrogen Concentrations

2021· article· en· W3217356313 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chen Cheng, Ronggui Liu, Wenpeng Hou, Michael J. Christensen, Yinglong Liu, Jianfeng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Plant Breeding · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersProgram for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNutrientResorptionNitrogenChemistryAnimal scienceHorticultureDry weightMetalMagnesiumBotanyNuclear chemistryBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well known that low N limits crop yield, but plants can rationally use nutrients to improve the plant growth at adverse environments. However, the effects of  E. gansuensis  on nutrient resorption efficiency and metal ion contents of  Achnatherum inebrians  at low N were unknown.  A. inebrians  with (E+) and without  E. gansuensis  (E-) were treated with 0.1 mM (low) N and 7.5 mM (normal) N, after 90 days, the dry weight, the contents of N, P, K, Na, Mg, Zn, Cu, Ca and Fe in senescent and green leaves, N/P/K resorption efficiency at 0.1 mM N and 7.5 mM N were assayed. We found that  E. gansuensis  enhanced the dry weight of green leaves of  A. inebrians , and increased nitrogen resorption efficiency (NRE) of host plant, and the content of N and P in green leaves at 0.1 mM N, but decreased N content in senescent leaves compared to E- plant at 0.1 mM N. The  E. gansuensis  played an important role in improving host grasses growth at low-N stress by enhancing NRE, and influencing the content of Na, Mg, Zn, Cu, Ca and Fe in senescent leaves and green leaves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Plant BreedingSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207