MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enhanced Interleaved PWM Scheme with Flux Compensation for Three-Parallel Connected Inverters

2021· article· en· W3217362003 on OpenAlexaff
Chenhui Zhang, Marius Takongmo, John Salmon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulse-width modulationInductorInductanceVoltageModulation indexInverterControl theory (sociology)Total harmonic distortionModulation (music)Electrical engineeringThree-phaseVoltage sourceElectronic engineeringPhysicsTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringComputer scienceAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pulse width modulation (PWM) scheme is described for a 3-phase voltage source converter (VSC). The VSC uses three inverter legs in each phase, which are connected in parallel using coupled inductors with crossed coupled windings to lower the series output inductance. The parallel connected inverters are controlled with three 120° phase-shifted carriers. Instead of changing carriers on the $\pm 1/3$ crossover of the 3-phase reference signals to improve the quality of the PWM line voltages, the reference signals are modified. This modulation scheme generates high-quality 4 -level phase and 7 level PWM line voltages without generating flux jumps in the coupled inductors. In addition, the PWM voltage step is ${\mathrm {V_{dc}}}/3$ and the frequency of the PWM line voltage is six times greater than the switching frequency, which can easily be filtered with a small filter inductor. The modulation scheme significantly reduces the cross-sectional area, weight, and material cost of the magnetic cores of the VSC, which is suitable for mobile applications such as aerospace and electric vehicles where weight-light magnetics is required. The enhancement of the PWM scheme is appreciated with lower current THDfand load voltage harmonic volt-seconds. The feasibility of the modulation scheme is confirmed with PLECS simulation and experimental results of a 10 kW(300 Vdc, 208 V/28 A) laboratory prototype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207