MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217369125 · doi:10.1109/tii.2021.3129888

Deep Bayesian Slow Feature Extraction With Application to Industrial Inferential Modeling

2021· article· en· W3217369125 on OpenAlexaff
Chao Jiang, Yusheng Lu, Weimin Zhong, Biao Huang, Dayu Tan, Wenjiang Song, Feng Qian

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceBayesian inferenceInferenceFeature extractionArtificial intelligenceMachine learningData modelingNonlinear systemData miningBayesian probabilityPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inferential modeling has been of significance for modern manufacturing in estimating the quality-related process variables. As an effective inferential model, probabilistic slow feature analysis (PSFA) has gained attention in regression tasks to interpret dynamic properties with a slowness preference. However, PSFA is often challenged by the nonlinear sequential data due to its linear state-space structure. In this article, a new nonlinear extension of PSFA is proposed under the deep learning framework to enhance the dynamic feature extraction with limited labels, incorporating variational inference and Monte Carlo inference to derive the objective function. The proposed model considers the relevance of inputs with outputs as the input weights to upgrade prediction performance. The proposed model is verified through an industrial hydrocracking process to predict diesel yield with missing labels ranged from 0% to 50%, and the root mean squared error is reduced by at least 8.78% compared to PSFA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial InformaticsSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207