Uncertainty Estimation via Monte Carlo Dropout in CNN-Based mmWave MIMO Localization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, there has been much interest in the use of convolutional neural networks (CNN) for mobile user localization in massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems operating at millimeter wave (mmWave) frequencies. However, current CNN-based approaches cannot predict the confidence interval bounds for the localization accuracy. While the Bayesian neural network (BNN) method can be employed to estimate the model uncertainty, it entails a high computational cost. In this letter, the Monte Carlo (MC) dropout based method is proposed as a low-complexity approximation to BNN inference for capturing the uncertainty in a CNN-based mmWave MIMO outdoor localization system, without sacrificing accuracy. The proposed method is evaluated by means of simulations using a ray-tracing model of urban propagation at 28GHz. Results show that the localization uncertainty region can be properly determined and that their shape depends on the maximum power received at the user.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it