The Zionist Vision of the Transjordan Region: The Historical and Future Vision
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to research the vision of the Zionist ideology for the Transjordan region of Jordan through the previous historical periods, and to research the future vision of it in light of the deal of the century and the transformations in the region, this study attempts to clarify the factors that led to Zionism’s interest in the Transjordan region, whether this interest was at the same level across historical periods, or whether there was a transformations in it, in addition to explain the future Zionist vision for Transjordan (the Jordanian state) in the light of the deal of the century, The study required research into the historical roots of the Zionist vision for the Transjordan region and its changes, In addition to analyzing some biblical texts, the opinions and statements of some Zionist thinkers and leaders, and analyzing the texts of the Deal of the Century, and clarify the reasons for choosing Jordan as an alternative homeland, The study concluded that Transjordan has a special importance in the Zionist thought, which for a long time considered it an extension of historical Palestine, but after the 1967 war it abandoned its claim and considered it the best place to establish an alternative homeland for the Palestinians, which if achieved would help Israel get rid of the burden the Palestinian demographic by displacing Palestinians to Transjordan and settling refugees there, and that contributes to achieving an important aim for Israel, which is the Jewishness of the state; Thus, the Palestinian issue is resolved, and Israel becomes a natural part of the region, which makes it easier for it to play the role of the leader of the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".