Multimodal Sentiment Analysis Using Multi-tensor Fusion Network with Cross-modal Modeling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rapid development of social networks, more and more people express their emotions and opinions via online videos. However, most of the current research on multimodal sentiment analysis cannot do well with effective emotional fusion in multimodal data. To deal with the problem, we propose a multi-tensor fusion network with cross-modal modeling for multimodal sentiment analysis. In this study, the multimodal feature extraction with cross-modal modeling is utilized to obtain the relationship of emotional information between multiple modalities. Moreover, the multi-tensor fusion network is used to model the interaction of multiple pairs of bimodal and realize the emotional prediction of multimodal features. The proposed approach performs well in regression and different dimensions of classification experiments on the two public datasets CMU-MOSI and CMU-MOSEI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it