Quality of Labor Epidural Analgesia at a High-volume Tertiary Care Obstetric Unit: A Before-and-After Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
( Reg Anesth Pain Med . 2021;46:157–163. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101873. [Epub November 6, 2020]. PMID: 33159006) Randomized controlled trials show neuraxial analgesia minimizes pain and improves patient experience across North America, yet these findings are under controlled conditions within homogenous populations. Also, practice changes were made between 2011 and 2017 at the institution’s obstetric unit including a more consistent epidural loading dose of local anesthetic plus fentanyl, increased hourly and maximum limits of bupivacaine, and conversion from continuous epidural infusion to programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) regimen. Any changes in reported data between the 2 time periods provide insight on the quality of labor analgesia. This study aimed to improve maternal care and outcomes by further understanding the safety, quality, and patient satisfaction of labor analgesia using prospective observational studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".