MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evaluating a Microgrid Control System Using Controller Hardware in the Loop Simulations

2021· article· en· W3217528788 on OpenAlexafffund
Mo'ath Farraj, Roshani Kaluthanthrige, Athula Rajapakse

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersResearch Manitoba
KeywordsTestbedMicrogridIEC 61850Controller (irrigation)Hardware-in-the-loop simulationControl engineeringComputer scienceDistributed generationEmbedded systemSoftware deploymentProtocol (science)Hierarchical control systemControl systemDistributed computingEngineeringControl (management)Renewable energyComputer networkAutomation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, microgrids have become significantly complex due to the integration of inverter-based distributed energy resources (DERs) along with conventional generation resources. Proper deployment of microgrid control strategies is imperative to achieve a reliable, secure, and stable power system operation. This paper presents a hierarchical controller embedded in a model predictive control framework. The functionality of the proposed microgrid controller is demonstrated on a controller hardware in the loop (CHIL) simulation platform. The structure of the testbed, the development and coordination of the hierarchical control levels, and the integration of the IEC-61850 communication protocol are discussed. The overall study confirms the effectiveness of the proposed hierarchical controller as well as the applicability of the developed testbed in providing a realistic operation evaluation platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.333
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207