Los ajustes razonables en los puestos de trabajo para las personas con discapacidad en Colombia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
“Caminos de la Dignidad: reflexiones sobre las distintas facetas de los Derechos Humanos” es un libro resultado de investigación, producto del desarrollo del proyecto de convocatoria interna de la Corporación Universitaria del Caribe CECAR, titulado: Modelo integrador de construcción de paz desde la familia, la educación y la empresa para la reconciliación y el ejercicio de los derechos humanos en el departamento de Sucre, Colombia. Obra colectiva en coautoría y colaboración con investigadores que presentan resultados de investigaciones de proyectos de instituciones tales como Universidad Popular del Cesar, Corporación Universitaria Americana, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Corporación Antonio José de Sucre, Universidad de Cartagena, Fundación Universitaria Tecnológico Comfenalco, Universidad Sergio Arboleda Santa Marta y La Corporación Universitaria del Caribe CECAR en el marco de la Alianza con la Red de Grupos y Centros de Investigación Sociojuridica Nodo Caribe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it