Fall-to-the-centre as a PT symmetry breaking transition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The attractive inverse square potential arises in a number of physical problems such as a dipole interacting with a charged wire, the Efimov effect, the Calgero-Sutherland model, near-horizon black hole physics and the optics of Maxwell fisheye lenses. Proper formulation of the inverse-square problem requires specification of a boundary condition (regulator) at the origin representing short-range physics not included in the inverse square potential and this generically breaks the Hamiltonian’s continuous scale invariance in an elementary example of a quantum anomaly. The system’s spectrum qualitatively changes at a critical value of the inverse-square coupling, and we here point out that the transition at this critical potential strength can be regarded as an example of a <?CDATA ${\mathscr{PT}}$?> PT symmetry breaking transition. In particular, we use point particle effective field theory (PPEFT), as developed by Burgess et al [1], to characterize the renormalization group (RG) evolution of the boundary coupling under rescalings. While many studies choose boundary conditions to ensure the system is unitary, these RG methods allow us to systematically handle the richer case of nonunitary physics describing a source or sink at the origin (such as is appropriate for the charged wire or black hole applications). From this point of view the RG flow changes character at the critical inverse-square coupling, transitioning from a sub-critical regime with evolution between two real, unitary fixed points ( <?CDATA ${\mathscr{PT}}$?> PT symmetric phase) to a super-critical regime with imaginary, dissipative fixed points ( <?CDATA ${\mathscr{PT}}$?> PT symmetry broken phase) that represent perfect-sink and perfect-source boundary conditions, around which the flow executes limit-cycle evolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".