Late Onset Pompe Disease with Novel Mutations and Atypical Phenotypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Late onset Pompe disease (LOPD) is rare and generally manifests predominantly as progressive limb girdle muscle weakness. It is linked to the pathogenic mutations in GAA gene, which leads to glycogen accumulation in various tissues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We describe the unusual clinical, biochemical, histopathological and genetic characteristics of 5 cases of LOPD. RESULTS: The first case had progressive anterior horn cell like disease (AHCD) that evolved later to classical limb girdle syndrome and respiratory failure, the second patient had rigid spine syndrome with gastrointestinal manifestations, the third had limb girdle weakness superimposed with episodic prolonged worsening and respiratory failure, the fourth had large fibre sensory neuropathy without primary muscle involvement and the fifth presented with classical limb girdle muscle weakness. Two homozygous missense mutations c.1461C > A (p.Phe487Leu) and c.1082C > T (p.Pro361Leu) in the GAA gene were identified in case 1 and 2 respectively. Case 3 was compound heterozygous with inframe c.1935_1940del (p.Val646_Cys647del) and an intronic splice effecting variant c.-32-13T > G. Compound heterozygous missense variants c.971C > T (p.Pro324Leu) and c.794G > A (p.Ser265Asn) were identified in case 4. Case 5 had a frameshift insertion c.1396dupG (p.Val466GlyfsTer40) and a synonymous splice affecting variant c.546G > T(p.Thr182=). CONCLUSION: We are describing for the first time from India on LOPD with unusual phenotypes identified. A high degree of clinical suspicion and diagnosing rare phenotypes of Pompe disease is imperative to consider early initiation of Enzyme Replacement Therapy (ERT).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".