EL DERECHO A LA ALIMENTACIÓN ADECUADA EN CHILE Y SU NECESARIA CONSAGRACIÓN COMO DERECHO FUNDAMENTAL EN LA NUEVA CONSTITUCIÓN CHILENA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amid the process of constitutional reform in Chile, this article addresses the historical, factual and international human rights arguments that justify the incorporation of the right to adequate food as an autonomous right in the new Constitution. Subsequently, the body of this text assesses the impact of this new constitutional right on Chilean private law, especially regarding the consumer protection regime and the right to be informed. The text argues that, ultimately, a constitutional right to adequate food will allow to extend the current norms on truthful and adequate information for consumers, contributing to a better guarantee of other human rights intrinsically related to food, such as the right to health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it