Impact of Using Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) Models for Arabic Dialogue Acts Identification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Human-Computer dialogue systems, the correct identification of the intent underlying a speaker's utterance is crucial to the success of a dialogue. Several researches have studied the Dialogue Act Classification (DAC) task to identify Dialogue Acts (DA) for different languages. Recently, the emergence of Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) models, enabled establishing state-of-the-art results for a variety of natural language processing tasks in different languages. Very few researches have been done in the Arabic Dialogue acts identification task. The BERT representation model has not been studied yet in Arabic Dialogue acts detection task. In this paper, we propose a model using BERT language representation to identify Arabic Dialogue Acts. We explore the impact of using different BERT models: AraBERT Original (v0.1, v1), AraBERT Base (v0.2, and v2) and AraBERT Large (v0.2, and v2), which are pretrained on different Arabic corpora (different in size, morphological segmentation, language model window, …). The comparison was performed on two available Arabic datasets. Using AraBERTv0.2-base model for dialogue representations outperformed all other pretrained models. Moreover, we compared the performance of AraBERTv0.2-base model to the state-of-the-art approaches applied on the two datasets. The comparison showed that this representation model outperformed the performance both state-of-the-art models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".