MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217751284 · doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3130648

Direct Sparse Odometry With Planes

2021· article· en· W3217751284 on OpenAlexaff
Fang Wu, Giovanni Beltrame

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdometryArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePlane (geometry)PoseComputer visionVisual odometryArtificial neural networkSegmentationAlgorithmMathematicsRobotGeometryMobile robot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a novel formulation to use plane primitives in the direct sparse odometry formulation. Unlike existing SLAM works that introduce geometric error terms to account for planes, our method keeps the full error as purely photometric. The proposed system exploits the segmentation masks and plane parameters from a deep neural network and jointly optimizes the camera poses, 3D points, and 3D planes. The tightly-coupled formulation improves the pose estimation by fusing information on high-level geometric primitives and also refines the outputs of the plane detection network during optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Robotics and Automation LettersSame topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207