La notion de l’enfant borderline-en-devenir à la lumière des recherches contemporaines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le diagnostic d’un trouble de la personnalité limite dans l’enfance s’avère controversé. Dans une perspective développementale de la psychopathologie, Pine (1974, 1986) a proposé la notion de l’enfant borderline-en-devenir. Il suggère que ce dernier soit caractérisé par la survenue de traumas dans le contexte relationnel à la figure de soins, ce qui aurait altéré sa capacité à s’engager dans un développement normal et entraîné l’utilisation de mécanismes défensifs permettant d’assurer sa survie psychique. Les propositions de Pine trouvent des résonnances avec les écrits contemporains. Elles sont ainsi revisitées au travers des concepts tels que les traumatismes relationnels précoces et l’attachement. L’intégration des résultats empiriques issus des recherches scientifiques actuelles à la théorie de Pine permet de proposer un modèle explicatif de l’enfant borderline-en-devenir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".