MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217807237 · doi:10.1080/03610926.2021.2005100

Cumulative and relative cumulative residual information generating measures and associated properties

2021· article· en· W3217807237 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidualResidual entropyCumulative distribution functionMathematicsClosenessDivergence (linguistics)StatisticsMeasure (data warehouse)Entropy (arrow of time)Kullback–Leibler divergenceStatistical physicsProbability density functionComputer sciencePhysicsMathematical analysisAlgorithmData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we propose cumulative residual information generating (CRIG) and relative cumulative residual information generating (RCRIG) measures and then establish some of their properties. A new divergence measure based on the CRIG function is proposed to measure the closeness between two survival functions as well as a cumulative residual Kullback-Leibler divergence. We also present Jensen-cumulative residual information generating function, whose derivatives generate some new cumulative information measures such as Jensen-cumulative residual Taneja entropy, Jensen-fractional cumulative residual entropy and Jensen-Gini mean difference measure. We further show that the Jensen-cumulative residual information generating function can be expressed as a mixture of two versions of the proposed new divergence measure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it