MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W322306858 · doi:10.1353/jur.2012.0025

Derecho Patrimonial Canónico (review)

2012· article· en· W322306858 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œJurist/˜The œjurist · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanon lawCivil codeAlienationCode (set theory)Subject (documents)HumanitiesPhilosophyLawPolitical scienceLibrary scienceComputer scienceSet (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Derecho Patrimonial Canónico Jobe Abbass OFM CONV, Professor of Canon Law Derecho Patrimonial Canónico by Jean-Pierre Schouppe. Pamplona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra, S.A. (EUNSA), 2007. As the author states (18), this manual is the Spanish version of his 1997 Elementi di diritto patrimoninale canonico but he has revised and augmented it [End Page 271] particularly from the perspective of Spanish civil and canon law (both universal and particular) as well as by his ten years of experience teaching this subject at the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross in Rome. Instead of the usual running commentary of the canons of Book V of the Latin Code, the author has opted for a more wide-ranging treatment of the matter that draws from these many perspectives in eight chapters for just over two hundred pages. Chapter 1 provides a very brief description of the present structure of the Latin Code in terms of temporal goods and its application of subsidiarity and the "canonization" of civil law. Chapter 2 describes constitutive principles of canon law respecting temporal goods (CIC cc. 1254-1258), while chapter 3 treats the classification of those goods. The juridical ways of acquiring temporal goods (Title 1, Book V) are dealt with in chapter 4. At the core of the book (100 pages), chapter 5 concerns financing the Church in the various ways indicated by the Latin Code (Titles 1 and 4, Book V), while the administration and alienation of ecclesiastical goods are treated in chapter 6 (Titles 2 and 3, Book V). Chapter 7 examines the diocesan and parochial structures that oversee financing. Finally, chapter 8 regards the administration of goods in religious institutes and societies of apostolic life although the latter do not seem to be covered. The option to treat the subject of temporal goods from so many perspectives was both interesting and innovative. That said, however, the lack of any index proved frustrating for one searching to find where a certain canon was discussed. The author might think of adding an index to a second edition of this manual or, even better, to an augmented edition of his 1997 Elementi since there is really a need for a good, updated commentary on temporal goods in the Catholic Church. That is not to discount in any way the importance of the interrelationship of civil and canon law in the context of Church ownership of goods in society today. In fact, it is a very delicate subject that has to be studied more thoroughly especially in the light of increasing legal claims against Church property and the hierarchy. In this regard, as a canonist, it is easy to agree with the author that the pope does not have shared ownership (dominium) but, instead, assures the ecclesiality over property by his power of governance (50). While this argument might convince theoretically-minded civil law jurists, it probably would not persuade concretely-minded common law judges who are increasingly asked to judge the vicarious and/or strict liability [End Page 272] of the hierarchy, and even of the pope, in abuse cases. Here, details regarding the pope's primacy and power over temporal goods (177-178), if introduced into evidence, would probably assure a civil judge's unfavorable decision. Following repeated papal calls for comparative studies of the two Codes of the Catholic Church, it is to be hoped, at least at the doctoral level and beyond, that canonical studies duly consider the integral parts of the Church's one Corpus iuris canonici. The book's introduction, however, expressly states that the manual deals with temporal goods in the Latin Church but it does, happily, make a few, footnoted references to the Eastern Code. Still, footnote 3 should be updated bibliographically for Eastern references on the subject [see Folia canonica 5 (2002) 125-147]. This manual is undoubtedly the product of serious and ongoing scholarship. In the area of ecclesiastical goods, it is bound to be useful as a reference for canonists in general and as an important resource for Italian and Spanish canonists in particular. Jobe Abbass OFM CONV, Professor of Canon Law Saint Paul University Ottawa, Canada Copyright © 2012 The Catholic...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œJurist/˜The œjuristSame topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207