MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W32250119 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c01604

鼎談 フィルム・ノワールの文化学 (特集 フィルム・ノワールの文化学)

2009· article· en· W32250119 on OpenAlexfundno aff
弘 小松, 隆三 内田, 哲士 山本

Bibliographic record

Venueiichiko · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicATP Synthase and ATPases Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Engineering Research BoardNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMemorial University of NewfoundlandShastri Indo-Canadian Institute
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aminoglycoside phosphotransferase (APH(3')-IIIa) kinases form a clinically central group of antibiotic-resistant enzymes. Computationally, we have studied the catalytic mechanism of the APH(3')-IIIa enzyme at the atomic-level. The proposed reaction mechanism involves protonation of Asp190 by the kanamycin 3'-hydroxyl group mediated through an explicit neighboring water molecule, which leads to a simultaneous nucleophilic attack on the γ-phosphate of the ATP by the deprotonated kanamycin 3'-hydroxyl group. The second step is a proton abstraction from the protonated Asp190 to the phosphate group of the phosphorylated kanamycin mediated by an explicit water molecule. The calculated Gibbs energy of activation (Δ<i>G</i><sup>⧧</sup>) of the rate-determining step for the phosphorylation reaction is 77 kJ mol<sup>-1</sup> at the M06-2X/6-311++G(2df,p)//ONIOM(M06-2X/6-31+G(d):HF/6-31G(d)) level of theory. This study has provided a new understanding of the APH(3')-IIIa catalytic mechanism that agrees with the available experimental data (Δ<i>G</i><sup>⧧</sup> = 75 ± 4 kJ mol<sup>-1</sup>) and could provide a starting point for the rational design of mechanism-based inhibitors of aminoglycoside modifying enzyme to circumvent antibiotic resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiichikoSame topicATP Synthase and ATPases ResearchFrench-language works237,207