MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sensitive Periods in Visual Development

2013· reference-entry· en· W323255154 on OpenAlexaff
Daphne Maurer, Terri L. Lewis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFace Recognition and Perception
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisual cortexSet (abstract data type)Visual processingContrast (vision)Computer scienceFace (sociological concept)NeurosciencePsychologyArtificial intelligencePerception

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patterned visual input during early infancy plays a key role in constructing and/or preserving the neural architecture that will be used later for both low-level basic vision and higher-level visual decoding. The high-contrast, low spatial frequencies that newborns can extract from their environment set up the system for later development of fine acuity, expert face processing, and specialization of the visual cortex for visual processing. Nevertheless, considerable plasticity remains in adulthood for rescuing the system from earlier damage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFace Recognition and PerceptionFrench-language works237,207