MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W32393424 · doi:10.1691/ph.2020.9165

On-Orbit Performance of the Bright Target Explorer (BRITE) Nanosatellite Astronomy Constellation

2014· article· en· W32393424 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Karan Sarda, Cordell Grant, Monica Chaumont, Seung Yun Choi, Bryan Johnston-Lemke, Robert Zee

Bibliographic record

Venue˜Die œPharmazie · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Space AgencyKarl-Franzens-Universität GrazBundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und TechnologieÖsterreichische ForschungsförderungsgesellschaftUniversität Wien
KeywordsConstellationAstronomyPhysicsSpacecraftSatelliteSkyRemote sensingGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2013, the first three satellites of the BRITE-Constellation mission, believed to be the world’s first satellite constellation dedicated to astronomy, were placed into orbit on two separate launches. To be eventually composed of at least six cooperating nanosatellites, BRITE-Constellation’s mission is to perform a survey of the most luminous stars in the Earth’s sky. In the push to observe ever fainter objects, these apparently bright stars, despite being prominent members of our most familiar constellations, have been poorly studied and are not well understood. Typically massive and short lived, through their turbulent lives and via their especially violent deaths as supernovae, these stars dominate the ecology of the Universe and are responsible for seeding the interstellar medium with elements critical for the formation of planetary systems and organic life. Using three-centimeter aperture telescopes for differential photometry, BRITE-Constellation measures brightness variations, in two colours, at the millimagnitude level, a precision at least 10 times better than what is currently achievable from ground based observations. Comprised of nearly-identical 7-kg nanosatellites, BRITE-Constellation was designed by the University of Toronto, Institute for Aerospace Studies, Space Flight Laboratory (UTIAS-SFL) of Canada. Each of three countries, Austria, Poland, and Canada, funded two of the six satellites. Three of these satellites were integrated and tested in Austria and Poland under the guidance of SFL personnel, while the other three were built and tested at SFL. Through this international collaboration, the constellation boasts not just the smallest astronomy satellites ever flown, but also the first Austrian spacecraft and the first scientific satellites for Poland. As such, the mission has garnered a tremendous amount of public support and interest in all countries involved, and generally world-wide. As a result of the inherent mass, volume, data, power and financial constraints, performing a mission of BRITEConstellation’s scope on the nanosatellite scale was particularly challenging. Not least among the challenges was the need to point the spacecraft with an accuracy and stability never previously achieved with a spacecraft so small. Enabled by advances in miniaturized technology, precise characterization and tuning of attitude hardware and novel estimation and control techniques, BRITE-Constellation is now pushing the nanosatellite performance envelope by achieving three-axis pointing at the sub arc-minute level, an advance which has helped ensure BRITE-Constellation will provide substantial scientific return on investment in the years to come. This paper describes the goals, key design and operational challenges, on-orbit performance, and early scientific results of this cutting-edge mission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜Die œPharmazieSame topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207