MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W324030672 · doi:10.5751/es-01353-100214

Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being: a Participatory Study in a Mountain Community in Portugal

2005· article· en· W324030672 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elvira Pereira, Cibele Queiroz, Henrique M. Pereira, Luı́s Vicente

Bibliographic record

VenueEcology and Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLand Use and Ecosystem Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcosystem servicesCitizen journalismEcosystemEnvironmental resource managementGeographyWell-beingEnvironmental planningTotal human ecosystemEcologyEnvironmental protectionEcosystem healthPolitical scienceEnvironmental scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pereira, E., C. Queiroz, H. Pereira and L. Vicente 2005. Ecosystem services and human well-being: a participatory study in a mountain community in portugal. Ecology and Society 10(2): 14. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01353-100214

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations195
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcology and SocietySame topicLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesFrench-language works237,207