MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W324252225 · doi:10.54166/rhle.2013.08.08

Nuevos datos históricos sobre el "ser" focalizador

2013· article· es· W324252225 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Historia de la Lengua Española · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Linguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersUniversidad de Valladolid
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esta breve nota se centra en presentar documentación histórica del verbo ser focalizador en el español de América. Teniendo en cuenta que, hoy en día, el fenómeno se puede documentar en Venezuela, Colombia, Panamá y Ecuador, resulta coherente pensar que sus orígenes se remonten a un pasado en el que estos cuatro países conformaron un territorio común. Gracias a la revisión llevada a cabo en varios de los epistolarios publicados hasta la fecha de los presidentes (y militares) de la Gran Colombia, ofrecemos los primeros casos históricos de este fenómeno. Con todo, parece que el empleo de ser focalizador se pudo conformar entre militares, como un rasgo mas del lenguaje militar (y político) de la época, al menos desde principios del siglo XIX, lo que podría explicar su difusión geográfica actual y su aceptación social.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it