Study on Forging Ahead Strategy of Developing Country from the Perspective of Comparative Advantage ETUDE DE LA STRATÉGIE D'ALLER DE L'AVANT DU PAYS EN DÉVELOPPEMENT DANS LA PERSPECTIVE DE L'AVANTAGE COMPARATIVE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: New trade theory, which is the representative of the contemporary comparative advantage theory, has become the mainstream trade theory, but the theory is developed in the country whose market economy is relative developed, and therefore it has not analyzed problems from the perspective of developing countries. New trade theory reveals the positive role that technology plays in trade, but it does not discuss how the developing country should do to realize catching up and surpassing by using technology and it does not give the instruction on how the developing countries can skip comparative benefit trap. From the perspective of comparative advantage, this paper establishes the game models between developed countries and between developed and developing countries, and points out that the developing countries can't narrow the gap with the developed countries and achieve national economy takeoff until they implement the Forging Ahead Strategy. Key words: comparative advantage, forging ahead strategy, Game Resume: La nouvelle theorie du commerce, qui est representative de la theorie de l'avantage comparatif contemporaine, est devenue la tendance generale de la theorie commerciale. Mais cette theorie est developpee dans des pays dont l'economie de marche est relativement developpee, et ainsi elle n'a pas analyse les problemes sous l'angle des pays en developpement. La nouvelle theorie du commerce revele le role positif de la technologie dans le commerce, mais elle ne discute pas comment les pays en developpement doivent faire pour rattraper et surpasser avec l'aide de la technologie, et elle ne donne pas non plus l'instruction sur comment les pays en developpement peuvent eviter le piege de benefice comparatif. Dans la perspective de l'avantage comparatif, le present article etablit des modeles de jeu entre les pays developpes et les pays en developpement, et indique que les pays en developpement ne peuvent raccourcir l'ecart avec les pays developpes et accomplir l'essor de l'economie nationale que s'ils mettent en oeuvre la Strategie d'aller de l'avant. Mots-Cles: avantage comparatif, strategie d'aller de l'avant, jeu 1. COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES GAME MODEL BETWEEN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES. From development of comparative advantage theory, we can see that the theory of comparative advantage is still the core of international trade theory, since it explains that international trade is the result of comparative advantage. However, developed and developing countries will have completely different outcome when they take development strategy in accordance with the theory of comparative advantage. As for developed countries, they have their own comparative advantages in industries and products. We suppose that two developed countries can choose to develop advantage industries or advantage products (strategy 1), or to develop the non-advantage industries and non-advantage products (strategy 2). If both countries choose strategy 1, resources, labor and capital will be used in most effective way, and social wealth will be increased, as a result, the two countries will get the most benefits. If one country chooses strategy 1, while the other one chooses strategy 2, resources, labor and capital will be relatively wasted. If both countries choose strategy 2, resources, labor and capital will be wasted seriously. If (k, Bj) represents the advantages of both countries when the developed country A takes strategy i while developed country B takes strategy j, then the game model between developed countries from perspective of comparative advantage is shown as below. According to the principle of forging ahead strategy and the theory of comparative advantage, developed countries should develop their advantage industries and products so that the productivity and social wealth can be increased, and thus each country can acquire its maximum profit. In other words, above model can prove that comparative advantage theory completely suited to international trade and the international division of labor between developed countries. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".