Issues and concern of wives who were infected with HIV and lost their husbands to AIDS in Malaysia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Structural Mass Spectrometry (SMS) provides a comprehensive toolbox for the analysis of protein structure and function. It offers multiple sources of structural information that are increasingly useful for integrative structural modeling of complex protein systems. As MS-based structural workflows scale to larger systems, consistent and coherent data interpretation resources are needed to better support modeling. Unlike the proteomics community, practitioners of SMS lack adequate computational tools. Here, we review new developments in the Mass Spec Studio: an expandable ecosystem of workflows for the analysis of complementary SMS techniques with linkages to modeling. Current functionality in the Studio (version 2) supports three major SMS workflows (crosslinking, hydrogen/deuterium exchange and covalent labelling) and two pipelines for structural modeling, with a special focus on data integration. The Mass Spec Studio is an architecture focused on rapid and robust extension of functionality by a community of developers. SIGNIFICANCE: This review surveys the new data analysis capabilities within the Mass Spec Studio, a rich framework for rapid software development specifically targeting the community of structural proteomics and structural mass spectrometry. Updates to crosslinking, hydrogen/deuterium-exchange and covalent labeling apps are provided as well as a utility for translating such analyses into restraints that support integrative structural modeling. These new capabilities, together with the underlying design tools and content, provide the community with a wealth of resources to tackle complex structural problem and design new approaches to data analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".