MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W325089294 · doi:10.3138/jcs.35.4.111

Vertical Limits: A Foreign Ministry of the Future

2000· article· en· W325089294 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Andrew F. Cooper

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Studies · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary and Defense Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChristian ministryContradictionObsolescenceMinistry of Foreign AffairsForeign policySpace (punctuation)Function (biology)TimelineSociologyPolitical sciencePublic administrationPoliticsLawBusinessMarketingHistoryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the contradiction between function and institutional form within Canada's Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade. At odds with the image of obsolescence, the foreign ministry has assumed a higher profile in adapting to the diffuse and flatter conditions of the post-Cold War world. Yet, despite the expanded space in which it can operate, DFAIT has lagged behind in its organizational adaptation. If pushed out in new directions of a horizontal nature vis-à-vis its policy agenda, DFAIT remains imbued with verticality in terms of its corporate design and culture. In order to close this gap, a mapping exercise is attempted to locate the foreign ministry of the future. Cutting across the entire ambit of its operations, selected snapshots are offered about the manner by which the foreign ministry can be reshaped.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian StudiesSame topicMilitary and Defense StudiesFrench-language works237,207