Comparaison des vis verrouillées et vis standard pour l'ostéosynthèse par plaque vissée d'une perte de substance médiodiaphysaire expérimentale : étude mécanique en flexion 4 points
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author’s purpose was to compare 2 different osteosynthesis with LCP plate paired either with 6 bicortical locking screws or 6 bicortical standard screws, used to repair comminuted tibial fractures. The 2 different constructs were applied on 4 groups of 6 sheeps. Bone-plate constructs and contralateral bones were loaded in quasi-static 4 point bending. Extrinsic stiffness was measured, to determine the influence of screw locking after 6 weeks and 12 weeks of bone healing. The study showed no significantly difference between the two types of osteosynthesis. However, extrinsic stiffness of the standard group was significantly lower than the stiffness of controlateral bones after 12 weeks of bone healing, which was not the case for the locking group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".