A Strategy for a Successful Christian Sexual Education Ministry in the African American Church
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peptides have been widely adopted as biological targeting vectors for applications in molecular imaging and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Somatostatin (SST) analogues such as octreotate (TATE) are exogenous ligands for somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), which are highly expressed on neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Recently, both [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE (NETSPOT) and [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (LUTATHERA) received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and PRRT of NETs, respectively. However, to the best of our knowledge a well-described synthesis of DOTA-TATE has not been reported in the literature. Herein, we report a fully reoptimized DOTA-TATE synthesis, including the application of a simple ultrasonic bath to greatly improve yields, reduce coupling times, and decrease the amount of reagents required for each coupling step by a half. The most prevalently used cyclizing agents such as iodine, thallium(III) trifluoroacetate, hydrogen peroxide, and dimethyl sulfoxide were compared. On-resin cyclizations using mechanical agitation showed higher yields (23% and 25% using I<sub>2</sub> and Tl(III), respectively) than off-resin (1.3% and 11% using DMSO and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, respectively), and the total synthesis time of DOTA-TATE was ∼540 min excluding the cyclization step, with a total synthesis yield of ∼23%. The same manual SPPS methods/reagents were reoptimized with ultrasonic (US) agitation, resulting in an immense reduction in the total synthesis time by ∼8-fold to ∼70 min for DOTA-TATE with a higher yield (∼29% yield), and ∼13-fold to 105 min for DOTA-PEG<sub>4</sub>-TATE (∼29% yield). Also, the use of US agitation reduces the need for excess molar equivalents of the reagents to a half, which is particularly important when coupling expensive or custom-synthesized groups such as bifunctional chelators and linkers. Finally, the synthesized DOTA-TATE was successfully radiolabeled with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga<sup>3+</sup> (<i>t</i><sub>1/2</sub> = 68 min) with high radiochemical yields (30 min, 95 °C). We believe this work opens the door to the facile and low-cost synthesis of many new chelator-<i>linker</i>-peptide conjugates that were previously cumbersome or cost-prohibitive to produce with manual SPPS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".