Observations expérimentales sur le recours aux suppléments de revenu comme stratégie visant a " rendre le travail payant"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article presente des observations realisees a partir de deux experiences sur des echantillons aleatoires au Canada en vue de tester le recours aux aides financieres pour encourager la participation au marche du travail. Le Projet d?autosuffisance tend a montrer que des complements de revenus salariaux apportes a des emplois faiblement remuneres a temps plein peuvent accroitre l?emploi parmi les chefs de famille monoparentale beneficiaires depuis longtemps de prestations sociales, et peuvent accroitre les gains et les revenus de ces familles pauvres sans alourdissement net sensible des transferts de l?Etat, deduction faite des impots supplementaires qui en decoulent. Dans le cas du Projet de supplement de revenu en revanche, la proposition de dedommager partiellement des beneficiaires de l?assurance chomage reprenant un emploi rapidement et subissant des pertes de revenus n?a eu aucun impact sur le comportement en matiere de participation au marche du travail de la part des utilisateurs recurrents de l?assurance chomage et n?a eu qu?un impact faible et de courte duree sur les travailleurs licencies. Dans sa conclusion, cet article revient sur la complexite de la conception d?un programme visant a stimuler l?effort de travail au moyen d?aides financieres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".