MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W327310546 · doi:10.21236/ada583025

Lake St. Clair: Storm Wave and Water Level Modeling

2013· report· en· W327310546 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tyler Hesser, Mary A. Cialone, Mary E. Anderson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and environmental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStormShoreWater levelEnvironmental scienceWave modelHydrology (agriculture)MeteorologyWind waveGeologyClimatologyOceanographyGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lake St. Clair is a shallow water body located between Lake Huron and Lake Erie in the Great Lakes complex with coastline in both the United States and Canada.The numerical modeling of waves and water levels was performed to capture storm conditions along the United States coastline.The methodology presented in Jensen et al. ( 2012) for Lake Michigan was followed for the majority of the project.The NOAA/NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis wind fields were adjusted for marine exposure wind speeds.The WAM wave model was validated and applied for production of all wind generated wave results, including ice when applicable.The ADCIRC model was forced with wind fields, flow rates at the St. Clair River boundary, and water levels at the Detroit River boundary and validated to water levels at St. Clair Shores and Windmill Point.The ADCIRC model was tightly coupled with four near-shore Full-Plane STWAVE model grids using CSTORM-MS.The results show good agreement between all validation data sets, and low errors in the production storms with which data was available.In total, 145 storm events were run with the full numerical system to quantify the water level response to extreme events in Lake St. Clair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.121 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and environmental studiesFrench-language works237,207