MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W327695278

The (Dis?)connected North: Persistent Regionalism in Northern British Columbia */le Nord-Connecte Ou Non? le Regionalisme Persistant Au Nord De la Colombie-Britannique *

2007· article· fr· W327695278 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sean Markey, Don Manson, Greg Halseth

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Regional Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesGeographyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper recounts findings drawn from extensive community-based research conducted across northern British Columbia designed to find out what ideas northerners have for improving economic development opportunities where they live. Findings illustrate that despite many marginal attempts at promoting regional development across BC, northerners maintain a resilient willingness, and recognize a strong economic imperative, to collaborate across the region. The paper outlines a variety of motivating forces compelling regional development and presents a series of seven principles, drawn from the community-based research, to guide the structure and intent of regionalist initiatives in northern BC. RESUMES Cet article present des resultats d'une recherche d'envergure a base communautaire du nord de la Colombie-Britannique, qui fut entreprise afin de reveler les idees des citoyens et citoyennes de ces regions pour ameliorer les occasions economiques ou ils habitant. Les resultats demontrent que malgre de nombreuses tentatives marginales de promouvoir le developpement regional a travers la Colombie-Britannique, les residents du nord maintiennent une volonte resilient et reconnaissent une imperative economique importante de collaborer dans la region. Nous presentons une variete de forces motivantes qui interpellent un developpement regionale et presentons sept principes, tires de la recherche a base communautaire, qui permettent d'orienter la structure et les objectifs des initiatives regionales au nord de la C.-B. *********** In recent years, northern British Columbia (BC) has experienced rapid changes in the stability and composition of its economy. The region is responding to multiple pressures, such as the softwood lumber dispute, the mountain pine beetle epidemic, and shifting directions in provincial policy. These pressures are affecting BC during a time of economic resource restructuring. But at the same rime, northern BC is experiencing booms in mining and oil and gas sectors, and is buoyed by a sense of comparative, if temporary, intra-provincial regional equity not seen since the 1980s (Finlayson 2005). This paper is the result of ongoing research, started in 2003, to address community and regional development issues in northern BC. Our starting point, the Northern BC Economic Development Vision and Strategy Project, was designed to find out what ideas northerners themselves had for improving economic development opportunities where they live. In general terms, we organized the project to answer a simple question: If people in northern BC were going to devise a vision and plan for economic renewal, and a structure to manage that renewal, how would they do it? Too often governments have imposed processes or plans on the region, and for too long, people in northern BC participated in those processes only to have key recommendations or outcomes changed or rejected. This legacy has created a good deal of skepticism about economic planning processes, and reinforced a view that the region and its communities are essentially on their own. In contrast, current economic challenges and opportunities have also created a great impatience to get on with the task of creating a plan to renew the economic strength and communities of the region. Drawing from the Project, the purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to understand why despite stated frustrations with past regional development efforts, regional approaches to development emerged as a strong theme from the research; and second, to provide a synthesis of guiding principles for future regional development work in northern BC which may then inform other jurisdictions. A third, and more literature-oriented purpose, is to respond to a general critique of new regionalism: that it is too abstract and lacking in bottom-up representation (Lovering 1999; Barnes et al 2000). In the following section, we provide a brief overview of the Project's process as well as the socio-economic context for northern BC. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Regional ScienceSame topicMining and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207