Third US-Japan Workshop on Advanced Research on Earthquake Engineering for Dams, San Diego, California, 22-23 June 2002
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report summarizes a workshop organized by the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), Vicksburg, MS, and the Public Works Research Institute of Japan (PWRI) under the auspices of the Task Committee on Dams of the Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects, part of the U.S.-Japan Cooperative Program in Natural Resources. The workshop was held in San Diego, CA, 22-23 June 2002, as part of the preconference activities of the 22nd U.S. Society on Dams Annual Meeting and Conference held at the same location 24-28 June 2002. The Workshop provided a valuable forum for the exchange of technical information related to seismic evaluation criteria for dams, numerical techniques for seismic analysis, seismic design and evaluation of appurtenant structures, instrumentation, condition assessment, seismic upgrade and rehabilitation, foundation problems, case studies, as well as many other general topics of interest. The workshop was attended by 64 U.S. participants, 10 Japanese participants, and 16 participants from other countries (Canada, China, Colombia, Dominican Republic, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Republic of Panama, and Spain).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".