Bibliographic record
Abstract
本文指出了现有二维直方图区域直分法中存在明显的错分，提出了二维直方图区域斜分方法，即通过与主对角线平行的四条斜线将直方图分成内点区、边界点区和噪声点区，并按灰度级与邻域平均灰度级之和的大小进行分割。该方法可以运用于所有的基于二维直方图的阈值分割。文中导出了基于二维直方图区域斜分的Tsallis—Havrda-Charvat熵阈值选取公式及其快速递推算法，给出了分割结果和运行时间。与基于二维直方图直分的Tsallis-Havrda-Charvat熵原始算法相比，本文提出的基于二维直方图斜分的Tsallis-Havrda-Charvat熵阈值分割算法，使分割后的图像内部区域均匀，边界形状准确，更有稳健的抗噪性，其运行时间减少了五个数量级。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".