MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W32844951 · doi:10.1159/000207160

Basophil Production

2009· article· en· W32844951 on OpenAlexaff
Judah A. Denburg, Elizabeth Brown, John Bienenstock

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Haematologica · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMast cells and histamine
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsBasophilGolgi apparatusMitosisCell biologyElectron microscopeChromatinGranule (geology)BiologyIn vitroStainingImmunologyPathologyEndoplasmic reticulumMedicineBiochemistryImmunoglobulin EGeneticsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Guinea pig bone marrow basophils were cultivated in vitro and morphological observations were made by light and electron microscopy. Maturation of basophils in vitro is supported by electron microscopic evidence for the development of a prominent Golgi zone with granule formation, nuclear chromatin changes, and specific periodicity of the intragranular matrix. Histochemical staining distinguishes these cells from other granulocytes, and mitotic basophils are recognizable on light microscopy. These methods allow more detailed study of the orderly growth and development of the basophil in a system where basophilopoiesis is actively taking place.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa HaematologicaSame topicMast cells and histamineFrench-language works237,207