Diagnostic accuracy of a stereotaxically guided vacuum-assisted large-core breast biopsy program in Canada.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy rate associated with 11-gauge vacuum assisted large-core breast biopsy (VALCBB) at our institution. METHODS: 673 consecutive VALCBBs performed between September 1997 and March 2000 were evaluated. For most of the benign VALCBB specimens, accuracy was determined by the stability of the lesions on follow-up mammography. When possible, histological results of specimens obtained from VALCBB and of specimens obtained from surgical excision were compared. Modified accuracy rates were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 673 biopsies, 499 (74%) were benign; for the 315 benign lesions for which complete follow-up information was available, a greater than 99% modified accuracy rate was obtained. The modified accuracy rate for the 174 nonbenign lesions was 95%. Thus, VALCBB yielded an overall modified accuracy for both benign and nonbenign lesions of 97.9%. CONCLUSION: VALCBB provides accurate histological results for biopsy of suspicious lesions of the breast.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".